Why the dismissal of romance fiction is a containment mechanism. Because for most of literary history, women’s interiority was written by men.
Not described by men. Not interpreted by men. Written — authored, constructed, handed down as the truth of what women feel, want, and experience from the inside. Male authors decided what female desire looked like. Male critics decided which versions were convincing. Male publishers decided which ones got published. And because the literary canon was shaped almost entirely by this process, the portrait of women’s inner lives that got treated as universal, as serious, as worth preserving — was a portrait men made.
This is not ancient history. It’s the prevailing condition romance fiction is writing against.
Romance is the largest-scale reclamation of narrative authority over women’s interiority in literary history. Not because of what’s inside any individual book. Not because the heroines are powerful or the sex is explicit or the emotional arcs are satisfying — though they often are. But because women are defining what women’s inner experience of desire, love, and selfhood looks like, on a massive commercial scale, without male mediation.
The authorship is the act.
That’s what makes it threatening. Not just the tropes. Not just the covers. The fact that millions of women are reading accounts of female interiority written by women, for women, and finding them more true than anything the literary canon offered.
Which brings us to the dismissal.
Romance fiction is one of the most commercially successful genres in publishing AND one of the most contemptuously dismissed. The sneering is so disproportionate to any actual quality argument that it demands explanation. Badly written literary fiction exists in abundance and receives polite reviews. Romance receives a specific kind of cultural contempt — the kind that requires women to be embarrassed about reading it, to hide the covers, to add the disclaimer ‘it’s just a guilty pleasure‘ before admitting they enjoyed it.
That shame is not accidental. It’s functional.
If women are embarrassed about romance — if we’ve internalised the message that our genre is frivolous, our desires are silly, our emotional needs are too much — we’re less likely to notice what romance actually represents. We’re less likely to take seriously the thing it’s doing. We’re less likely to defend it, think critically about it, or recognise it as a site of real cultural power.
The dismissal of romance is a containment mechanism. Keep women ashamed of the genre and you keep them from noticing that the genre is where women have been quietly, commercially, successfully reclaiming the right to define their own inner lives.
Feminist literary theory has a name for the broader project romance belongs to: écriture féminine — women writing from their own experience in ways that disrupt the male-dominated construction of what female experience is supposed to look like.
The concept has been applied extensively to literary fiction. But it’s almost entirely absent from romance criticism, which tends to argue either on content grounds (the heroines are strong, the sex is female-centred) or on commercial grounds (women control the industry). Both arguments are true. Neither gets to the structural claim.
The structural claim is this: romance is where women are doing the thing that has been controlled for centuries. Defining our own interiority. Deciding what our desire looks like from the inside. Writing the inner life that was written for us for so long that many of us absorbed the male version as true.
You don’t need to think every romance novel is well-written to understand why that matters. You don’t need to defend every trope. You just need to notice what the dismissal is protecting — and stop letting it work.
If you want to hear more from me, you can subscribe to my newsletter. Take your pick of freebie you’d like to get when you sign up 👇
One snake bite. One moment of clarity she really didn’t ask for. Sasha Barrett has survived two years at the Praetorian Academy — turns out her captain was always going to be the most dangerous thing in the field.
Want to get more out of reading books?
Grab this FREE guide on how to start a reading journal, complete with review templates, reading trackers and bingo sheets.
Understand yourself better as a reader, engage more with the books you read & make space for creative self-expression. Get it now!
