Here’s a question that will quickly ruin romantasy for you, or at least make it more interesting: where are the mothers?
Not absent in the way mothers are sometimes absent in fiction — busy, offscreen, doing something else in that moment. But absent in the way that matters. Dead. Villainous. Weak. Irrelevant. Gone before the story starts, or removed so efficiently you don’t notice the surgery.
Feyre Archeron’s mother is dead before page one. Her legacy is a deathbed command that Feyre provide for her sisters — not knowledge, not power, not wisdom, but obligation. The only older women Feyre encounters in Prythian who hold real power are Amarantha and Ianthe: one a sexually predatory tyrant, the other a scheming priestess.
Both are killed.
Viviane ran the Winter Court competently for fifty years while her High Lord was imprisoned. She is never given the title. Amren is ancient and powerful, and the narrative treats her power as dangerous, something requiring containment.
But this isn’t a Maas-specific problem. It’s a genre-wide one. The romantasy heroine (too) often arrives motherless, mentorless, and isolated from every woman who might have taught her something (potentially trailing female dependants that are framed as lesser than her). And then a centuries-old man teaches her what she needs to know to become a fully-formed woman.
I’ve written before about the structural importance of age gap in romantasy — the competence hand-off where the ancient MMC cedes authority to the contextless FMC, and the maiden/crone split where older women with knowledge are coded as threats. But those posts named specific mechanisms. Here I want to take a look at a structure that sits underneath all of them. The thing that makes those mechanisms necessary. And makes them possible.
The question isn’t why romantasy has so many dead mothers. The question is why the older woman has been removed from every role simultaneously.
She can’t be the lover.
The age gap in romantasy flows one direction: older man, younger woman. Always.
The five-hundred-year-old High Lord and the nineteen-year-old mortal. The immortal commander and the cadet. The centuries-old king and the girl who just arrived. Reverse the polarity — older woman, younger man — and the genre treats it as novelty at best, impossibility at worst.
This isn’t preference. It’s prohibition.
An older woman paired with a younger man triggers a different response than the reverse, and the difference is structural. The older man with the younger woman activates a taboo the genre wants to play with — authority, danger, the pleasurable frisson of surrender to someone who knows more than you do. The older woman with the younger man activates a taboo the genre can’t touch: she becomes the mother. The dynamic slides from erotic to familial, and the whole architecture collapses (in the eyes of the patriarchy).
Researchers have named this directly. The large age difference between an older woman and a younger man gets culturally read as a mother-son relationship. The incest prohibition fires — not because there’s anything incestuous happening, but because the only cultural framework available for an older woman’s authority over a younger man is maternal. We don’t have another story for it.
Or rather: we refuse to tell one.
The older man with the younger woman doesn’t trigger the same collapse. He gets to be the mentor, the protector, the dark authority, the experienced hand. Nobody reads him as her father — or if they do, the genre leans into it (looking at you, “daddy” discourse). His age is power. Her age is purity.
The asymmetry isn’t a bug. It’s the architecture.
She can’t be the mentor.
If the older woman can’t be the lover, can she at least be the teacher? The guide? The Gandalf figure who shows up with knowledge and authority and shapes the heroine’s journey?
Look at romantasy and tell me where she is.
The FMC’s education — magical, political, tactical, sexual — routes almost exclusively through men. Rhysand teaches Feyre to read, to shield her mind, to wield her power. He gives her the title of High Lady. Her competence is a gift from him. The women around her are either peers (the Inner Circle, who are her equals but also constantly potential competitors for male attention, not her teachers), or threats (every older woman with institutional knowledge – just think of how the story talks about her older sister Nesta).
This isn’t accidental. It’s structurally necessary.
A girl who learned what she knows from an older woman doesn’t need the MMC. Or at least, she doesn’t need him in the way the genre requires — as the sole source of her transformation.
The romance depends on the power differential.
If she arrives already shaped by a female mentor, already carrying knowledge passed down through a female line, the MMC’s role as teacher-lover-authority shrinks. The competence hand-off doesn’t work if she’s already competent, that’s just sensible management (and not as shiny as individual exceptionalism). The slow burn doesn’t ignite the same way if the gap between them isn’t total.
So the genre ensures the gap is total. It strips her of every female source of knowledge before the story begins.
She can’t be the authority.
The older women who do appear in romantasy — the ones who survived the narrative’s initial cull — exist in a narrow set of roles. Villain. Obstacle. Cautionary tale. Irrelevance.
I named this the maiden/crone split in the age gap post, but I didn’t say why the split exists. Here’s why.
The maiden is special. She’s young, uncorrupted, chosen. Her ignorance is a feature — it reads as freshness, authenticity, potential. The genre frames her lack of knowledge not as a deficit but as proof that she’s the real deal. She hasn’t been shaped by politics or power, pure as the driven snow. She can be shaped by him.
The crone is her inverse. She has the knowledge. She has the decades or centuries of experience. She has the political acumen and the institutional memory. And for exactly these reasons, she is framed as dangerous, corrupt, or past her moment.
Age gave the MMC wisdom and authority. Age gave the women bitterness and irrelevance. The genre applies a different formula depending on gender, and it does so consistently enough that the pattern is structural, not incidental.
Amarantha had power. Villain. Ianthe had influence. Villain. Viviane had competence. Sidelined. The older woman who has what the FMC lacks is never allowed to pass it to her. She is either destroyed or marginalised so that the only path to power runs through the man.
The operation.
These aren’t three separate problems. They’re one operation.
The genre removes the older woman from every position — lover, mentor, authority — because each one threatens the same thing: the FMC’s isolation. And her isolation is what the architecture requires.
A girl with a mother has a relationship that predates and potentially outranks the romantic one. A girl with a female mentor has a source of knowledge that doesn’t come from the love interest. A girl with older women as allies has a support structure that isn’t organised around a single man. In every case, the presence of a meaningful relationship between women disrupts the genre’s central engine: the romance as the heroine’s sole source of transformation, knowledge, and power.
So the genre ensures she has none of these things. It kills her mother. It codes her female elders as threats. It makes the MMC her teacher, her protector, her political sponsor, her entry point into the world, into becoming a full version of herself. And then it frames this total dependence as love.
This is not a missing mother problem. This is a mother prohibition. The genre doesn’t forget to include older women. It can’t afford to.
What romantasy performs, over and over, is something very old.
Older than the genre. Older than the novel. It takes the girl out of the company of women and places her under the authority of a man.
This is the foundational operation of patriarchal kinship. The daughter leaves her mother’s household and enters her husband’s. Her allegiance transfers. Her identity reshapes around the new structure. Whatever she knew before — whatever was passed down through the female line — becomes secondary to what she learns in her new position.
Romantasy replicates this structure with absolute fidelity. The FMC leaves the human world (or the mortal world, or the mundane world — always coded as the mother’s domain, if the mother existed at all) and enters the fae court, the magical kingdom, the immortal realm. This new world is governed by men. Her education begins fresh.
She is remade.
And the genre frames this as liberation.
That’s the sharpest irony. The narrative that promises female empowerment — the heroine who gains magic, gains a title, gains a throne — is built on the oldest patriarchal transfer in existence.
She is powerful, yes. But her power was given to her by a man, in a world that killed or exiled every woman who might have given it to her first.
What the genre can’t imagine.
Romantasy (or any speculative fiction) is a genre of total imaginative freedom. It can build worlds with seven courts and intricate magic systems. It can invent new species, new physics, new forms of government. It can imagine a nineteen-year-old mortal becoming the most powerful being in the realm.
It cannot imagine a girl who learned what she knows from her mother.
It cannot imagine an older woman who is desirable. It cannot imagine a female mentor whose knowledge is treated as gift rather than threat. It cannot imagine women in solidarity rather than competition — the older woman and the younger woman as allies, as co-conspirators, as a chain of knowledge stretching back through generations.
Women having relationships is not a barrier to romance. Never was.
And this failure of imagination isn’t a craft problem to be solved by writing better female characters. It’s a structural limitation built into the genre’s erotic and political architecture. The romance needs the girl to be alone. It needs the gap between her and the MMC to be total. It needs the only significant relationship in her life to be the one the genre is selling.
A genre that can imagine immortal kings but can’t imagine a girl who learned what she knows from a woman isn’t limited by its imagination. It’s limited by what it thinks desire is allowed to look like. And what it thinks desire is allowed to look like is: a young woman, alone, chosen by a powerful man, with no woman left to tell her she doesn’t need him to be a complete person.
That’s not a trope. That’s an architecture. And it’s the oldest one we have.
If you want to hear more from me, you can subscribe to my newsletter. Take your pick of freebie you’d like to get when you sign up 👇
One snake bite. One moment of clarity she really didn’t ask for. Sasha Barrett has survived two years at the Praetorian Academy — turns out her captain was always going to be the most dangerous thing in the field.
Want to get more out of reading books?
Grab this FREE guide on how to start a reading journal, complete with review templates, reading trackers and bingo sheets.
Understand yourself better as a reader, engage more with the books you read & make space for creative self-expression. Get it now!
